UX Research Maturity Model
![](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:700/1*6CF6f5M5opYVIMCBmXzB4g.png)
The UX research maturity model shown above is based on an organization’s level of buy-in for UX research in combination with the presence of UX research staff within an organization. The model is helpful when you are facing a decision of whether to fight for UX research buy-in or flee by quitting any fighting attempts.
The four quadrants of this model are as follows.
Maturity: both buy-in and staff
An organization believes in UX research, fully trusts UX research practice — whether in house or external — and behaves in a manner that is consistent with that belief. These are the rare organizations that truly get it. They have a deep understanding of and appreciation for UX research, and they back it up with action. They ask potential and existing users all the right questions to understand what they need, and they iterate and validate their designs to perfection.
Fight or flee? Neither. You won’t need to fight, and there is no reason to flee. All is well.
Approaching maturity: buy-in, but no staff
An organization states that UX research is important, but when it comes to action, there is no staff to act upon that policy. An organization may have hired consultants to do some ad-hoc research in the past and plans to hire their first full-time user experience researcher or a research team in the near future.
Fight or flee? Neither. This type of organization is currently taking baby steps in the right direction. Join this organization when it hires new people or transfer to an internal UX research position if you already work there in a different role.
Approaching immaturity: no buy-in, but there is staff
An organization employs UX research staff, but does not really buy into what they do, discover, and recommend. This type of organization is probably the hardest for UX researchers and other UX professionals to work in. It’s extremely frustrating for UX professionals to work in an environment that sends contradictory messages. On one hand, the organization appreciates UX design and research because it allocates headcount and hires the right people. On the other hand, it is evident that there is no appreciation for this discipline. The organization makes design decisions based on the wrong considerations, and stakeholders do not empower UX designers and researchers to do their jobs.
Fight or flee? To an extent, it’s worthwhile to fight, but if the organization doesn’t mature, flee.
Immaturity: no buy-in or staff
An organization does not believe in UX research — or has no position regarding research — and does not employ any in-house or external research practitioners. It’s probably easiest to know what to do in this type of organization. As Frank Costanza once said, “If they don’t want me, I don’t want them” — from a Seinfeld episode from 1996, “The Doll.” Such organizations should not — and usually do not — get the attention of UX professionals. Maybe they’ll get it eventually, maybe not. Chances are that they will someday. Until then, it’s a waste of time to even try working with them.
Fight or flee? Hopefully, neither. You’re probably not working for one of these organizations.
![](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:650/1*YkJLrGSBmnMLZqtG6lEefg.jpeg)
Please share a story about an organization you are familiar with and its UX research maturity.
Tomer Sharon is the author of Validating Product Ideas Through Lean User Research. Get a 20% discount when you purchase the book directly at Rosenfeld Media while using the code tomernews.
![](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:533/1*PXmoH2_AZFTNxraEcfHGrA.jpeg)
Sign-up for Tomer’s Lean User Research newsletter to get access to more resources on the topic. The newsletter will appear in your inbox no more than once a month.